Dudley Hanks wrote:
>> On another note, you can ditch the table layout if you wish and get
>> nearly the same look. That may help with accessibility, just float the
>> image right, is all.
>>
>> Jeff
>
>
> I tried something similar to that for an earlier version (on my other
site),
> and the text tended to get screwed up when browser windows were small.
How was that?
So,
> I opted for the table approach as per some other users suggestion.
>
> As far as accessability goes, table lay-outs work fine; they are just a
> pain to set up when using a screen reader.
> But, I'm getting better at it.
>
> However, I'll re-read my info on positioning images and maybe give it a
try
> again. It will probably get easier when I get into using cascading
style
> sheets, in a few weeks.
Are you taking a course?
Screw the wait and do it now. Take a look at the fluid layout site
that the "Not so Fat Man" did. That's nice work. But you don't need
something that complex.
Your site has a lot of weird white space where you don't need it. I'd
be suspicious of anyone who hasn't mentioned that. It's kind of all over
the place.
BTW, give it a strict doctype, I'm surprised Blinky didn't mention
that. You'll need that later when you get more advanced...
Jeff
>
> Thanks for the comments,
> Dudley
>
>
>
|
