Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible

On May 3, 1:30=A0am, "Ken Nadvornick" <register.nad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "Annika1980" wrote:
> > Ken's pic did nothing for me =A0.... maybe it was because the
> > color was off. =A0I liked the punchy colors in Doug Jewell's
> > pic (Ken, are you listening?).
>
> Heh, heh... =A0Now exactly how certain are you that it really isn't
one-th=
ird of
> a tri-color separation negative set? =A0Subtlety *is* the name of the
game=
, you
> know. =A0Maybe you just weren't looking hard enough for those
distracting
> colors... =A0;)
>

We know we can always count on you for technical excellence and a
display of mastery of your craft.  I also enjoy reading your detailed
notes.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Fence line along the West Snoqualmie Valley Road
Snohomish County, Wa****ngton, USA
7:03pm, Thursday, April 17, 2008
Dark, heavy overcast skies, intermittent rain.
Just finished dinner.  Had the fish.  Undercooked.

Ilford FP4+ B&W 120 roll film at ASA 160
Developed in Kodak D-76d (1+1) for 16 min at 68F/20C Split-printed on
Ilford Multigrade IV RC 8x10 glossy paper Digitized on HP 6200C
flatbed scanner, 680x680x24bpp/100 dpi Post-processed using GIMP 2.4
under Window 2000.
New computer chair purchased at Office Depot.
Room lighting 5450=B0, room temperature 71.4=B0 F.
Had to pee.