Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible

On Sun, 04 May 2008 07:35:40 +1000, Doug Jewell
<ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>That Rich wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 May 2008 23:57:16 +0800, "Wilba"
>> <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>> That Rich wrote:
>>>> Thanks to Wilba and Doug for their comments.
>>> No worries. Have a go yourself! :-) 
>>>
>> 
>> Much as I'd like I really can't... really... I don't know the first
>> thing about photography. I only take photos to see how things look
>> when photographed.
>I don't think you need to know about photography to comment. 
>If you can look at an image and go "that looks ok" or go 
>"hmmm i think that would be better if..." then you are more 
>than capable of reviewing the SI. In fact the opinions of a 
>non-photographer type are probably more valuable. It's easy 
>to get caught up in rules like thirds, balance, etc, and 
>forget that the objective is to make a nice picture. 
>Generally a nice picture abides by composition rules, but 
>not always.
>Please give it a go :)
>> 

OOps.

Meant to write this.  (I feel so shamed).

Believe me when I say I am not competent enough to comment.
Essentially, I turn dials on the camera until the little needle is
half way between the + and - , then push the doo-hickey on top.

RP©