Re: BLUEBIRDS LOVE THE 40D!

On May 5, 1:16=A0pm, Annika1980 <annika1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 5, 10:33=A0am, m II <c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Atheist Chaplain wrote:
> > > so please point out the stolen pictures.
>
> >http://www.dropshots.com/echo4#date/2006-12-23/16:36:28
>
> > This is my picture. The slime ball downloaded it, lightened the manger
> > scene area, then he put it on *his* web page as his own work.
>
> Bull****. =A0I posted it in my "Testing" gallery and posted a link to it
> here.
> I even offered to fix your original for you. =A0**** me for being so
> nice.
>
> Here is the entire thread.http://tinyurl.com/5mjc7f
>
> Note your original post attacking me. =A0"Don't start none, won't be
> none."
>
> It is true that my original re-posting of that pic carried no
> desciption or attribution.
> I thought none was needed since the only people seeing the pic would
> have come from my link here. =A0Then you mouthed off about it ... and
> you've been mouthin off about it since XMAS of 2006. =A0Get over it.

When I first saw that image I thought, what a nice sunset. Then Bret
cleaned it up a bit and showed the manger scene in the lower left hand
side. Made a big difference in the feel of the image.
  Then he even offered to do the same on the original image for the
original photographer and return the new image along with the
original. As far as I can see, Bret offered help to another
photographer to improve the image and got his head handed to him.
   The attacks on Bret seemed to me a bit over the top and with just
to much whining. The image had been removed from the listing that Bret
had done and that should have been the end of it. Maybe Bret did step
over bounds a bit. But this continuing attacks on him and his personal
images seems to be just freaking juvenile.


Draco