Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > 35 MM Cameras > Re: [SI] Shoot-...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 59 of 69 Topic 14649 of 15568
Post > Topic >>

Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible

by Stuffed Crust <pizza@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 12:45 PM

jimkramer <Newsreader1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> http://www.pbase.com/shootin/pov


Blame me for the mandate, folks.  It's sad that I didn't submit anything 
(I have got to get me a set of extension tubes).  I'll have to make up 
for it in critiques.  (Naturally, the results are posted when I go off 
for a camping trip...)

So, given that it was my mandate suggestion, one would think I had a 
clue what I had in mind?  Pshaw!  Original thoughts are for wusses!

Tully - Cute Doggy Award! You got down to its level, but I think it 
might have worked better had you tilted the camera upwards a tad, or 
taken a photo of somoene handing you a bone.  But that would be a 
totally different photo.  So ignore me.

Alienjones - Corrupted Youth Award!  One has to wonder how many leagues 
that fair maiden has watched slide by as she yearns for freedom.  
Personally I'd loved to have a shot from beneath her, looking upwards, 
form the POV of the ocean being cleaved by her mighty um, cleavage.  But 
that too would be totally different.  So ignore me.

Bowser - Live Free or Die Award!  If only there was more of a sense of 
motion.  And a mermaid on point.  But then you'd probably ignore the 
road.  And me.  (This is perhaps the closest to my original idea for the 
mandate.)

Tom Gabriel - Downtrodden M***** Award!  You demonstrate that life 
really is rather boring, despite what the liberal elite media overlords 
that run the shoot-in (and their co-consiprators) want you to think.  
You showed them!  Now take this tinfoil hat and ignore me.

Ken Nadvornik - Color-blind Commie Award!  How dare you give hope to our 
enemies by showing our them that our imperialist capitalist system is 
fundamentally corrupt and unustainable.  In all seriousness, a bit 
of spot color would have really increased the punch here, especially if 
the flag is as faded as it appears to be.  IMNSHO, naturally, so ignore 
me.

Wilba - You-saved-my-kitty Award!   Or maybe it's the Self-****trait 
#212.4 Award.  I'm up a tree and confused.  So ignore me.

Paul Furman - On Eagles Wings Award!  About to pounce on a pixel-sized 
jackrabbit.  Perhaps the cleanest commercial airliner window I've ever 
seen.  With such pretty scenery, you'd have to be crazy to not ignore 
me.

Rich Pos - The Shaken, not-stirred Award!  I like the lighting and 
general feel here.  I can't help but think that a top-down view of the 
martini (grasped by a hand clad in fire-engine-red nails) wouldn't have 
been cooler, but I've been declared officially un-cool, so my opinions 
are ignored anyway.

Doug Jewell - The I-don't-know-anything-about-art Award!  If someone 
paid for the um, illustrations, then it's art.  The punchy colors are in 
stark contrast with what feels to be a very depressing place.  But since 
when have art critics been worthy of not ignoring?

Walter Banks - The where-are-my-gl***** Award!  - I can't seem to get a 
feel for the depth or even a sense of scale.  It's actually giving me a 
bit of a headache to look at it, so I'm going to ignore it.
(I really liked the linked photo though...)

Jim Kramer - The 'mmm, tasty...' Award! - Another image that I think 
could have benefitted from a spot of color (this time, in the eyes).  I 
just can't get my cats to stay still when I stick a camera near their 
faces, so my hat's off to you.  Now if only it had a feather sticking 
out of its mouth or something.  But that too would be totally different 
so feel free to ignore me.

Helen Silverberg - The 'how does she do it?' Award - Once again, she 
manages to punch us in the gut yet feel grateful for her doing it, 
stealing the show yet again.  If you ignore me here, you're a heartless 
commie bastard.   I'm still in awe.

Bret Douglas - The "We control the horizontal" award - I just can't 
figure out the perspective or even what this is, so I ended up cheating.  
And I still don't get it.  Quite an accomplishment.  No color needed 
here, unless it's the blood of your enemies, trickling through the slats 
as their bodies are shredded further with each step.  But I cheated, so 
ignore me.

What, you got this far?  I thought I told you to ignore me?

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy        		       pizza at shaftnet dot org	 
Melbourne, FL                          ^^ (mail/jabber/gtalk) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.          ICQ: 1318344
 




 69 Posts in Topic:
[SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"jimkramer" <  2008-05-02 09:54:21 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Troy Piggins <usenet-0  2008-05-03 00:11:21 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-02 09:20:11 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-02 20:51:57 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-02 22:30:28 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-02 22:49:03 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-03 14:37:32 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-03 20:14:47 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 22:23:56 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-03 13:43:34 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-03 06:47:13 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Jufi" <bows  2008-05-04 21:19:03 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-05 06:33:34 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Jufi" <bows  2008-05-05 17:33:19 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-06 10:22:29 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-05-03 18:07:20 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-05-03 23:01:06 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-05-04 07:32:11 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-05-03 19:32:28 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 05:24:54 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-03 23:57:16 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 12:09:09 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-05-04 07:35:40 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 19:34:34 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"William Graham"  2008-05-04 12:58:55 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 19:37:05 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 13:50:49 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-03 06:39:16 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 06:54:56 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 00:01:13 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-03 14:44:40 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Jufi" <bows  2008-05-04 19:19:54 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 06:45:24 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Tully Albrecht <tully.  2008-05-03 10:28:01 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 13:41:40 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-03 14:28:26 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 13:48:57 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Tully Albrecht <tully.  2008-05-03 23:13:45 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 14:37:20 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Jufi" <bows  2008-05-04 21:20:16 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 14:14:13 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-03 14:31:49 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 14:37:12 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-03 18:35:37 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-04 00:30:41 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 14:09:12 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 19:38:08 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 14:03:14 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-03 18:21:56 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 18:27:08 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 20:44:42 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 20:31:21 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-03 23:45:01 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 14:15:02 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-04 07:49:15 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 22:57:09 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"jimkramer" <  2008-05-05 08:33:46 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-06 10:20:40 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Stuffed Crust <pizza@[  2008-05-07 12:45:26 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-07 10:12:49 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Stuffed Crust <pizza@[  2008-05-07 17:53:26 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-07 15:17:04 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-07 13:13:27 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"jimkramer" <  2008-05-07 10:44:44 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Stuffed Crust <pizza@[  2008-05-07 17:50:55 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-07 16:22:18 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-07 14:44:01 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-08 18:56:06 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-10 10:49:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 18:49:05 CST 2008.