Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > 35 MM Cameras > Re: Shoot-In Po...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 67 of 69 Topic 14649 of 15568
Post > Topic >>

Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible

by Helen <helensilverburg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 02:44 PM

On May 7, 8:45=A0am, Stuffed Crust <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> jimkramer <Newsread...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >http://www.pbase.com/shootin/pov
>
> Blame me for the mandate, folks. =A0It's sad that I didn't submit
anything=

> (I have got to get me a set of extension tubes). =A0I'll have to make up
> for it in critiques. =A0(Naturally, the results are posted when I go off
> for a camping trip...)
>
> So, given that it was my mandate suggestion, one would think I had a
> clue what I had in mind? =A0Pshaw! =A0Original thoughts are for wusses!
>
> Tully - Cute Doggy Award! You got down to its level, but I think it
> might have worked better had you tilted the camera upwards a tad, or
> taken a photo of somoene handing you a bone. =A0But that would be a
> totally different photo. =A0So ignore me.
>
> Alienjones - Corrupted Youth Award! =A0One has to wonder how many
leagues
> that fair maiden has watched slide by as she yearns for freedom. =A0
> Personally I'd loved to have a shot from beneath her, looking upwards,
> form the POV of the ocean being cleaved by her mighty um, cleavage.
=A0But=

> that too would be totally different. =A0So ignore me.
>
> Bowser - Live Free or Die Award! =A0If only there was more of a sense of
> motion. =A0And a mermaid on point. =A0But then you'd probably ignore the
> road. =A0And me. =A0(This is perhaps the closest to my original idea for
t=
he
> mandate.)
>
> Tom Gabriel - Downtrodden M***** Award! =A0You demonstrate that life
> really is rather boring, despite what the liberal elite media overlords
> that run the shoot-in (and their co-consiprators) want you to think. =A0
> You showed them! =A0Now take this tinfoil hat and ignore me.
>
> Ken Nadvornik - Color-blind Commie Award! =A0How dare you give hope to
our=

> enemies by showing our them that our imperialist capitalist system is
> fundamentally corrupt and unustainable. =A0In all seriousness, a bit
> of spot color would have really increased the punch here, especially if
> the flag is as faded as it appears to be. =A0IMNSHO, naturally, so
ignore
> me.
>
> Wilba - You-saved-my-kitty Award! =A0 Or maybe it's the Self-****trait
> #212.4 Award. =A0I'm up a tree and confused. =A0So ignore me.
>
> Paul Furman - On Eagles Wings Award! =A0About to pounce on a pixel-sized
> jackrabbit. =A0Perhaps the cleanest commercial airliner window I've ever
> seen. =A0With such pretty scenery, you'd have to be crazy to not ignore
> me.
>
> Rich Pos - The Shaken, not-stirred Award! =A0I like the lighting and
> general feel here. =A0I can't help but think that a top-down view of the
> martini (grasped by a hand clad in fire-engine-red nails) wouldn't have
> been cooler, but I've been declared officially un-cool, so my opinions
> are ignored anyway.
>
> Doug Jewell - The I-don't-know-anything-about-art Award! =A0If someone
> paid for the um, illustrations, then it's art. =A0The punchy colors are
in=

> stark contrast with what feels to be a very depressing place. =A0But
since=

> when have art critics been worthy of not ignoring?
>
> Walter Banks - The where-are-my-gl***** Award! =A0- I can't seem to get
a
> feel for the depth or even a sense of scale. =A0It's actually giving me
a
> bit of a headache to look at it, so I'm going to ignore it.
> (I really liked the linked photo though...)
>
> Jim Kramer - The 'mmm, tasty...' Award! - Another image that I think
> could have benefitted from a spot of color (this time, in the eyes).
=A0I
> just can't get my cats to stay still when I stick a camera near their
> faces, so my hat's off to you. =A0Now if only it had a feather sticking
> out of its mouth or something. =A0But that too would be totally
different
> so feel free to ignore me.
>
> Helen Silverberg - The 'how does she do it?' Award - Once again, she
> manages to punch us in the gut yet feel grateful for her doing it,
> stealing the show yet again. =A0If you ignore me here, you're a
heartless
> commie bastard. =A0 I'm still in awe.
>
> Bret Douglas - The "We control the horizontal" award - I just can't
> figure out the perspective or even what this is, so I ended up cheating.
=
=A0
> And I still don't get it. =A0Quite an accomplishment. =A0No color needed
> here, unless it's the blood of your enemies, trickling through the slats
> as their bodies are shredded further with each step. =A0But I cheated,
so
> ignore me.
>
> What, you got this far? =A0I thought I told you to ignore me?
>
> =A0- Solomon
> --
> Solomon Peachy =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 pizza at
sh=
aftnet dot org =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
> Melbourne, FL =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0^^
(mail/=
jabber/gtalk) ^^
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ICQ:
1318344=




LOL...that's Sol for your critique.  It made me smile.
Helen
 




 69 Posts in Topic:
[SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"jimkramer" <  2008-05-02 09:54:21 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Troy Piggins <usenet-0  2008-05-03 00:11:21 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-02 09:20:11 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-02 20:51:57 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-02 22:30:28 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-02 22:49:03 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-03 14:37:32 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-03 20:14:47 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 22:23:56 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-03 13:43:34 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-03 06:47:13 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Jufi" <bows  2008-05-04 21:19:03 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-05 06:33:34 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Jufi" <bows  2008-05-05 17:33:19 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-06 10:22:29 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-05-03 18:07:20 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-05-03 23:01:06 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-05-04 07:32:11 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-05-03 19:32:28 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 05:24:54 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-03 23:57:16 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 12:09:09 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-05-04 07:35:40 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 19:34:34 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"William Graham"  2008-05-04 12:58:55 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 19:37:05 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 13:50:49 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-03 06:39:16 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 06:54:56 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 00:01:13 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-03 14:44:40 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Jufi" <bows  2008-05-04 19:19:54 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 06:45:24 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Tully Albrecht <tully.  2008-05-03 10:28:01 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 13:41:40 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-03 14:28:26 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 13:48:57 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Tully Albrecht <tully.  2008-05-03 23:13:45 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 14:37:20 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Jufi" <bows  2008-05-04 21:20:16 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 14:14:13 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-03 14:31:49 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 14:37:12 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-03 18:35:37 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-04 00:30:41 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 14:09:12 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 19:38:08 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 14:03:14 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-03 18:21:56 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 18:27:08 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 20:44:42 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-03 20:31:21 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-03 23:45:01 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 14:15:02 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-04 07:49:15 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-04 22:57:09 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"jimkramer" <  2008-05-05 08:33:46 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-06 10:20:40 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Stuffed Crust <pizza@[  2008-05-07 12:45:26 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-07 10:12:49 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Stuffed Crust <pizza@[  2008-05-07 17:53:26 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Walter Banks <walter@[  2008-05-07 15:17:04 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-07 13:13:27 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"jimkramer" <  2008-05-07 10:44:44 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Stuffed Crust <pizza@[  2008-05-07 17:50:55 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
That Rich <that_rich@[  2008-05-07 16:22:18 
Re: Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-07 14:44:01 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Wilba" <use  2008-05-08 18:56:06 
Re: [SI] Shoot-In Point of View is Visible
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-10 10:49:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 17:52:08 CST 2008.