"Alienjones" <alienjones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:g0dq2n$o2e$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Annika1980" <annika1980@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:3e6ae794-007d-49bb-81d0-ab1b89e79e3d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 13, 6:49 pm, "Alienjones" <alienjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>The truth is:
>>
>> I did in fact respond to the challenge and as Gordon confirmed... Could
do
>> exactly what I claimed to be able to do. Idiots like Charlie Stevens
and
>> Bret Douglas are so jealous of anyone who can do something they can't,
they
>> set about to create a load of lies and defamation rather than accept a
>> package of truth.
>>
>
> Bull****. You later admitted that the image you sent them was made
> from a stitched image and not the original shot. Guess you forgot
> about that, eh Gramps? I'm sure Mark has the appropriate cites for
> you in his files.
> ------------------------------------
> If you are going to be a liar, learn how to remember things fool. Mark
is
> actually Charles and from his history of moving around changing his
> identity, I'd say he has more to worry about right now than finding a
vague
> reference on Google.
>
> I told ColinD the image I sent him was from a composite... Some 2 years
> after you started your pedantic bull**** and the Alan Browne saga.
What's
> up? You have a problem with honesty?
No, but it seems you do. That must go along with your failing memory. A
quote from and old post:
"Colin D:
I remember commenting at the time that I could not match the
smoothness and foreground definition with my setup here, and
attributed that to your magic algorithm. Little did I realize
that it was stitched, and I guess you could say that you stitched
me up as well.
To keep it more or less seemly here, all I will say is that I
am sorely pissed off at being used to sup****t your 'algorithm'
with a misrepresented print.
If there had been money involved I would have you for fraud.
In utter disgust,
Colin D."
I also told him the size of the
> composite ... ****hing WALL FILLING. His print equaled one frame of a
20D.
> More truth so put your hands over your ears to stop them burning.
More lies from a professional liar. Another quote to refresh your
failing
(selective) memory:
" Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm, aus.photo
From: Colin_D <nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:21:29 +1300
Subject: Re: Panorama software (Which do you use)
Declaration to all readers of this thread:
At no time did Douglas send, nor did I receive, a RAW file of the
print he sent me.
By his own statement, he made a 24x72 inch panorama from twenty
stitched images. He now wants us to believe that the 24x36 print he
sent me, the
right-hand half of the pano, was from a single frame? Like, 19 frames
used in the other half?
Douglas appears to have serious reality problems. His word is not to
be trusted.
Colin D. "
>
> Since then you've tried to impersonate me (Criminal Fraud) Hack my
sellers
> account on Ebay (identy theft) pasted **** into my images and gotten
your
> fake **** to post the link to it and after all these were taken down by
the
> hosts you scammed, you put em back on AOL. What disgusting perverted
fool
> you are.
Only in your mind, Douglas.
>
> The nice little record on http://www.annika1980.com
is about to be
updated
> too. Don't forget that old codger you shot some pics of... Get him on
the
> job mate. In fact I think I'll send him some information and see if
he'll do
> the court work in Chatanooga for me. That other idiot across the road
from
> him is more interested in divorces and taking my money for nothing I
> couldn't have gotten from the 'net.
More lies, more idle threats.
>
> Keep off the **** for a while and your memory might return. Hasn't your
> mother told you about blindness and what you're doing? Believe this
fool.
That might be the only thing you don't lie about as your own memory
seems
to be very poor. I also noticed that you wear gl*****.
> You have more than just my attention in what you do now. Behave yourself
for
> a change.
More idle threats. And you wonder why you have such a large base of
fans ?
>
> Congratulation about selling some photos. Three of em Huh?
> Excellent stuff.
>
> Not quite up there with publi****ng your own wedding industry magazines
like
> I do
Got any proof of that, blowhard, or are we just expected to take the
word of
a liar as the truth ?
but a lot better than posting all those worthless stamp size images
> you've been wasting your time with. Still, I suppose a dodo like you has
to
> learn somehow. You certainly aren't going to make any friends amongst
those
> who offered to help you with that bloody great chip on your sholder.
Learn
> by mistakes is a slow process as you are discovering.
That's why it helps so much when you post examples of your work, it
shows
everyone what NOT to do.
>
> Maybe I could interest you in one of my 2009 calendars?
Still can't manage to sell any, eh ? Must suck to have to give them away.
>I just ordered 10,000 of them for the coming season.
Must really suck having to buy your own photos !
> Let's see now, that makes the score a little unbalanced for you doesn't
it?
I'll bet it does. How do you make money if you have to buy your own
photos ?
> 13 photos per calendar X 8 regions.
WOW, thirteen photos, I'm impressed !!! Are those all recycled wedding
photos or did you have to take another 13 for the calenders ?
> Hmmm. Forgetting all the images in my wedding magazines,
Why "forgetting" them all, because they don't exist ?
that makes over a
> 100 published photos for me so far this year. Add the magazine shots and
> seriously Bret... You are a babe in the woods.
Either that or you're just a dulusional psycopathic liar.
>
> Don't worry matey... You won't ever catch up to me but if you keep at
it,
You're right, I don't think anyone will ever catch up to you in lying !
> I'm sure you'll soon enough get to number 4 and then 5 and so it will
go
> until you start to get paid for your effort in excess of the cost of
your
> gear and can then claim to be a professional.
I thought being a "pro" meant being able to take a decent photo ? This
is
something you haven't been able to show anyone, yet !
> Maybe then you'll know why it just isn't profitable to mess around with
a
> single pic the way you do.
Then why do you cry so loudly when you accuse someone of stealing one of
your ****y snapshots ????
>
> Until then, stick to minding your own business because when you interfer
> with mine, you are going to get more unwanted attention than a bloke in
your
> line of business really wants to have. The eyes of the world are on you
now
> son, let's see you apply yourself to getting out of the **** hole you
live
> in and make something of yourself for a change.
Oooooooooooh, more idle threats from the austrailian blowhard ! Time to
give it a rest, wanker.
|
