Re: Douglas' definition of honesty?

Mark Thomas wrote:
> Alienjones wrote:
>> To keep him honest in his appraisal of the enlargement...
> 
> 
> And not that I would ever rub it in, but seeing Douglas is referring to 
> 'honesty', here's *more* (refer to my other post on this thread) of what

> Colin_D said when Douglas attempted to pass off a stitched composite as 
> a 'genuine' enlargement.
> 

It seems the Stalker, the wanna be, the neverwillbe and the fossil from 
Arlington all have one thing in common. The ability to invent a story 
regardless of the facts or the truth of the matter.

For one thing... Gordon Moat (in 2005) was the second person in these 
groups to see one of my enlargements first hand. The only other person 
to see one was Alan Browne.

Gordon is the only person with any printing or photographic 
qualification. This makes his *****sment the only one with any substance 
to it.

Everything said by the stalker from Australia and the jackass from 
Chattanooga is just sour grapes. The fosil from Arlington? To be pitied 
for being fooled by the jackass but none toe less spreading lies.

Gordon Moat's review of my enlargement and his comments about the 
printing industry (as it was in 2005) are here, unedited and unaltered.

http://www.annika1980.com/evidence/moats-comments.htm

As for the honesty of the stalker from AU, no one should ever forget he 
high tailed it out of South Australia under an assumed name to hide out 
in Queensland. Never bothering to keep his Electoral enrollment address 
updated, not bothering to notify the police of his whereabouts or obtain 
a Queensland driver's license and comes on here as some sort of ****nning 
angel... A nice example of a mongrel swine indeed.

There's some really nice (NOT) people inhabiting Usenet and he is one of 
  the un-nicest I've ever come across. Right next to the jackass from 
Chattanooga and his puppet in Arlington.