Re: Big cat really quite small

Annika1980 wrote:
> On May 14, 12:36 am, "Alienjones" <alienjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> Congratulation about selling some photos. Three of em Huh?
> Excellent stuff.
> 
>> Not quite up there with publi****ng your own wedding industry magazines
like
> I do
> 
> 
> You mean the flyers you give away for free on your site featuring your
> crappy Bridezilla pics?  yeah, that compares favorably with selling
> photos to magazines.
> 
> Idiot.

For a backwood jackass, you sure are an insult to the (in) breed.

When someone distributes a 48 page magazine City wide, it actually 
qualify the owner of the magazine to be called a MAGAZINE PUBLISHER.

maybe 2 years ago it was a flyer. A year ago it was still a multi page 
brochure. Today it's a full fledged magazine with a client base that 
reads like a who's who of the restaurant and wedding industry.

While you were busy making an idiot out of yourself, I was quietly 
chiseling away at a publi****ng business than now produces 3 magazines 
and 10 regional calendars with some serious plans and prospects for when 
my grand children eventually take it over.

Sort of makes your miserable life and disgusting efforts to gain a few 
scored points look like the childish stupidity you've never grown out of.

In the words of Gordon Moat:

"I originally did not want to believe that Douglas MacDonald could get 
anything other than a mess with his large prints. While I agree with him 
that his lenses were a limit, his samples show the potential of digital 
prints, though only in controlled post processing and printing 
conditions. His results are not easy for just anyone to repeat. Skill, 
experience, and very good equipment allow higher limits."

This from a world recognized printing and photography specialist. Who do 
we believe? Him or the bunch of idiot rabble you managed to fool with 
the suggestion bull**** beats brains - well it does in your neck of the 
woods, that's for sure.

You bunch of losers couldn't organize a chook raffle in a hen house, 
much less a coherent argument.

http://www.annika1980.com
describes the criminal acts of Bret Douglas.