Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Large Format Photo Equipment > Re: WTB Calumet...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 13 Topic 2222 of 2307
Post > Topic >>

Re: WTB Calumet back springs

by "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 6, 2007 at 07:14 PM

"iga" <igapop@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:f6kub0$75t$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thank yoy very much, Richard !
> Could you please list less known old 5x7 cameras ?
> Thanks,
> Igor
> http://www.arrakis.es/~igapop
>

    Boy, I don't know where to start. 5x7 was a widely used 
size up to maybe 25 years ago. Most of the view camera 
makers made cameras in this size and all provided reducing 
backs for larger cameras. Names which come to mind 
immediately are:
Agfa/Ansco Universal View (in 5x7) and reducing back for the 
8x10 Commercial View
Kodak 2D, made in several sizes with reducing backs for the 
larger ones.
Korona
Deardorf
I think Linhof made a 5x7 and had reducing backs.
Calumet reducing back for the 8x10 C-2
Speed Graphic and Graflex SLR until about 1940.
I am pretty sure Sinar made a 5x7 version.
Probably some English and continental camera makers. 5x7 is 
very nearly "full plate" size. Such sizes and metric sizes 
were popular and 5x7 was close enough to allow its used with 
relatively minor modifications to the dimensions of the 
back.
    I am sure others following this group can add makes of 
cameras I've forgotten.
    Curiously enough 5x7 was really considered medium format 
at one time, large format meant 8x10, 11x14, and even 16x20 
cameras. Up to at least the 1950's a surprizing amount of 
advertising and commercial work was done with 11x14 cameras. 
These are now in demand by photographers doing fine art 
photography for printing on alternative printing processes. 
Film improved so much that the detail and grain of a 
negative now is probably comparable to one perhaps of four 
times the area or even more when compared to the films of 
the 1950's. So, 5x7 was essentially replaced by 4x5.
    The CC-400 was so widely used that it should be possible 
to find parts for it even if Calumet can't help.


-- 
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]





 13 Posts in Topic:
WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-04 19:45:58 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-04 23:25:09 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-05 10:39:54 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-05 16:07:15 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-05 23:27:00 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-05 22:51:11 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-06 10:26:05 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-06 19:14:32 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-07 00:01:07 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-07 01:40:39 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
darkroommike <darkroom  2007-07-16 21:21:06 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-17 14:58:16 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
deerowl <owlsplace@[EM  2007-07-21 14:33:12 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri May 16 22:00:39 CDT 2008.