Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Large Format Photo Equipment > Re: WTB Calumet...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 13 Topic 2222 of 2307
Post > Topic >>

Re: WTB Calumet back springs

by darkroommike <darkroommike@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 16, 2007 at 09:21 PM

Burke and James Grover (flat bed) and Saturn (hex monorail) 
5x7 models.
darkroommike

Richard Knoppow wrote:
> "iga" <igapop@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:f6kub0$75t$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Thank yoy very much, Richard !
>> Could you please list less known old 5x7 cameras ?
>> Thanks,
>> Igor
>> http://www.arrakis.es/~igapop
>>
> 
>     Boy, I don't know where to start. 5x7 was a widely used 
> size up to maybe 25 years ago. Most of the view camera 
> makers made cameras in this size and all provided reducing 
> backs for larger cameras. Names which come to mind 
> immediately are:
> Agfa/Ansco Universal View (in 5x7) and reducing back for the 
> 8x10 Commercial View
> Kodak 2D, made in several sizes with reducing backs for the 
> larger ones.
> Korona
> Deardorf
> I think Linhof made a 5x7 and had reducing backs.
> Calumet reducing back for the 8x10 C-2
> Speed Graphic and Graflex SLR until about 1940.
> I am pretty sure Sinar made a 5x7 version.
> Probably some English and continental camera makers. 5x7 is 
> very nearly "full plate" size. Such sizes and metric sizes 
> were popular and 5x7 was close enough to allow its used with 
> relatively minor modifications to the dimensions of the 
> back.
>     I am sure others following this group can add makes of 
> cameras I've forgotten.
>     Curiously enough 5x7 was really considered medium format 
> at one time, large format meant 8x10, 11x14, and even 16x20 
> cameras. Up to at least the 1950's a surprizing amount of 
> advertising and commercial work was done with 11x14 cameras. 
> These are now in demand by photographers doing fine art 
> photography for printing on alternative printing processes. 
> Film improved so much that the detail and grain of a 
> negative now is probably comparable to one perhaps of four 
> times the area or even more when compared to the films of 
> the 1950's. So, 5x7 was essentially replaced by 4x5.
>     The CC-400 was so widely used that it should be possible 
> to find parts for it even if Calumet can't help.
> 
>




 13 Posts in Topic:
WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-04 19:45:58 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-04 23:25:09 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-05 10:39:54 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-05 16:07:15 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-05 23:27:00 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-05 22:51:11 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-06 10:26:05 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-06 19:14:32 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"iga" <igapo  2007-07-07 00:01:07 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-07 01:40:39 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
darkroommike <darkroom  2007-07-16 21:21:06 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-07-17 14:58:16 
Re: WTB Calumet back springs
deerowl <owlsplace@[EM  2007-07-21 14:33:12 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri May 16 22:17:50 CDT 2008.