Re: Latest model of Canon cameras

In article
<471168a9$0$11570$5a62ac22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, werdan
<footrotdog@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> In film days, losing a stop meant shooting 200 instead of 100 ISO film
or 
> 400 instead of 200.  The noticable grain jumped up significantly each 
> increase and different films also rendered colours slightly differently.

> Bbeing low noise and low vibration meant the RT was perfect for indoor 
> concerts/recitals etc. where you are not trying to be obtrusive. The 'no

> blackout' meant it was good for following action in s****t. Except these 
> situations also require you to get the most out of your film sensitivity
and 
> 1 stop was critical. The fact that there is little discernible
difference 
> between ISO100,200 and even 400 on the latest Canon sensors shows that
this 
> isn't really a limitation anymore. Granted it would be a backwards step
in 
> sensor sensitivity but they way sensor development has been going, it
would 
> only be tem****ary one. 

So what's to stop retards from leaving the things lens-up on a picnic
table and burning a hole in the sensor? (They did it with the Pellix.)