Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Large Format Photo Equipment > Re: Dumb questi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 29 Topic 2244 of 2334
Post > Topic >>

Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5

by "Lawrence Akutagawa" <lakuNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 20, 2007 at 12:16 PM

"Robert Chin" <bchin_us@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ffd9re018fc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm sorry if this has been answered before.  This is a legit question so

> please bear with me.
>
> My set up is not optimum.  I do not have a dedicated darkroom (for now
at 
> least).  I've done many many rolls of film over the years.  I throw 
> everyting into a changing bag, load up a reel and no problem.
>
> I'm getting ready to process 4x5 sheet film for the first time.  It 
> requires a bit more space to handle the sheet film than rolls.  Since I
do 
> not have a dedicated darkroom, I can't fill the tanks with the necessary

> chemicals, leave them on a tabletop, and just lift the film holder from 
> tank to tank in the dark.
>
> So my question(s) is/are simple:  I've heard that because the processing

> tanks for 4x5 film take so long to fill, uneven development could
result. 
> Is this a real problem, or is it the opinion of someone really
obsessive? 
> Would I be better off making a light tight space to do this?
>
> Advice welcome from all.
>
> Thanks.

Look for a used 8x10 Unicolor Unidrum drum or like printing drum that
allows 
4x5 prints.  EBay is one source.  Something like 150 ml of solution each 
step needed to process 4 sheets of 4x5.  Very even development and table 
space required is minimal - about 1' x 2' will be ample...enough to
manually 
roll the loaded drum from side to side if not using a mechanical roller 
device.  You can load the drum in a change bag, attach the cover/lid, and
do 
all the processing in room light.

http://www.largeformatphotography.info/unicolor/

The BTZS tubes are an alternative, though each tube takes only one sheet
of 
film rather than the up-to-four that the Unidrum does.

http://www.viewcamerastore.com/product_info.php?cPath=27_74&products_id=36

And as Phil Davis pointed out in his book *Beyond the Zone System*, you
can 
make your own BTZS type tubes.  I've done that and they work well except
for 
the slight leakage as they are rolled on the counter surface.  I never
could 
get that leakage problem resolved.  Maybe if I could have located some
large 
enough o-rings?   I finally tired of that leakage and got myself some BTZS

tubes off EBay for the one or two sheet processing.  At some 50ml of 
solution each step, they work very well.
 




 29 Posts in Topic:
Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Robert Chin" &  2007-10-20 12:27:00 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Jean-David Beyer <jean  2007-10-20 16:27:30 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Peter <p2macgahan@[EMA  2007-10-20 09:41:09 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-10-20 12:16:02 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2007-10-20 14:12:46 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Starr <davestarr  2007-10-20 17:46:44 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
darkroommike <darkroom  2007-10-21 11:13:42 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-21 14:42:09 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Ken Hart" <  2007-10-21 20:19:06 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-10-21 21:52:48 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-22 06:13:10 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2007-10-21 20:09:39 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Mike ODonoghue <odonog  2007-10-22 06:47:18 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"pico" <pico  2007-10-28 20:11:48 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-10-29 01:20:33 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Ken Hart" <  2007-10-29 23:36:08 
Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2007-11-15 14:15:31 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-11-15 11:35:19 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2007-11-15 15:15:25 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Ken Hart" <  2007-11-15 19:59:52 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-11-16 04:16:23 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-11-17 13:41:38 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
John <use_net@[EMAIL P  2007-12-29 21:42:50 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2008-01-02 09:21:47 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
John <use_net@[EMAIL P  2008-01-02 08:48:01 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
____ <internetphobic@[  2008-01-02 22:02:02 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"pico" <pico  2007-11-15 19:12:49 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
Bogdan Karasek <bkaras  2007-11-16 01:03:37 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
Bogdan Karasek <bkaras  2007-11-16 01:11:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 13:09:11 CDT 2008.