Re: Latest model of Canon cameras

dj_nme wrote:
> John Monro wrote:
>> David Nebenzahl wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/18/2007 7:01 PM dj_nme spake thus:
>>>
>>>> David Nebenzahl wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> I can understand that you think your discussion is so interesting 
>>>>>> that FOUR photo groups should benefit from it, but what motivates 
>>>>>> you to post on comp.dsp as well?  Do you realise that 'comp' means 
>>>>>> 'computer' and 'dsp' means 'digital signal processing?'
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But, duuuuh, don't digital cameras use DSP? Huh? Huh?
>>>>>
>>>>> (Not disagreeing w/you here. I don't do smiley faces.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You very complaint is OT to this discussion.
>>>> If you both have nothing to say on Canon cameras, don't bother 
>>>> reading or replying to the messages in this message thread.
>>>> What do you have that is constructiive to add to this discussion on 
>>>> Cannon cameras?
>>>
>>>
>>> "OT"? So then why are you still crossposting to comp.dsp?
>>>
>>> And "Cannon"? Pu-leez.
>>
>>
>> So, dj_nme, why DO you post on comp.dsp?  Because it's there?
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
> 
> So why do you post in alt.photography?

Because he, like me, hit "Reply".

Jerry
-- 
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯