Re: MicroPress 4x5 question

On Nov 2, 7:29 am, "Max Perl" <max_p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Nicholas O. Lindan" <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i en
meddelelsenews:13ikncss2g3ls1a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > "Max Perl" <max_p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>
> >> The camera came with a Xenar 135/4.7 lens. Is this an OK performer?
>
> > Variable, some are good, some not so good -- you would have to
> > test and make your own decision.  Best performance will be at f22.
>
> >> I think I have the International Back version. What does this mean?
>
> > Same as a "Graflok" back
>
> >> ....that many suppliers of rollfilm backs can be used on the camera?
> >> ....e.g. a Horseman 6x9 back?
>
> > Yes.
>
> OK!  ......then I will go for such a back. The Horseman 6x9 has good
film
> flatness?
> Probably not as good as LinHof backs but these I can't use I guess?
>
>
>
> > --
> > Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
> > Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
> >http://www.darkroomautomation.com/index.htm
> > n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The Horseman roll backs seem to be highly regarded.  I also have an
MPP back that is pretty good.