Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Large Format Photo Equipment > Re: MicroPress ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 22 Topic 2253 of 2329
Post > Topic >>

Re: MicroPress 4x5 question

by "Max Perl" <max_perl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 3, 2007 at 11:40 PM

"Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i en meddelelse 
news:13iprqn167bb8e7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Max>>>
>>>   The cameras shown on the MPP site above appear to be clones of the 
>>> late Pacemaker Speed Graphic and Crown Graphic. More about these
cameras 
>>> can be found at http://www.graflex.org
>>>   There was also a curious camera built briefly by Busch in the USA. 
>>> This was evidently intended to meet the military specification for the

>>> Speed Graphic and had a focal plane shutter. Unlike the simple FP 
>>> shutter used on all Graphic and Graflex cameras the Busch shutter was 
>>> self-capping and had much better speed regulation. I think it also had
a 
>>> revolving back but am not sure. The standard Busch models certainly
did.
>>>   I have only ever seen one advertisement for this camera and have
never 
>>> seen an actual example. Busch cameras were of very high quality and
were 
>>> an alternative to the Graflex models for press photography.
>>>
>>
>> This graflex page was quite usefull. Now I found out what "drop bed"
>> means :-) and also why the camera can tilt the lens board back.
>> If MicroPress is a clone then maybe it uses the same lens boards as the
>> Pacemaker and it may be eassier to find one to mount a lens with or
>> without built in shutter.
>>
>    I don't know the MPP camera well enough to know about the lens
boards. 
> There are two series of boards for the late Graphics, one for the
earlier 
> Pacemaker and another for the later Super Graphic. The supers will work
in 
> the earlier camera but not the other way around. Both of these are
stamped 
> metal, probably aluminum, with folded in sides. I think the dimensions
are 
> on the Graflex site. I see these occasionally at local sales, usually
for 
> around $20 US. You can also sometimes get them from Midwest photo supply

> at: http://www.mpex.com/
>    One of the advantages of the focal plane shutter is the ability to
use 
> barrel mounted lenses.
>    It would be interesting to know more about the FP shutter on the MPP 
> camera, i.e., is it just a copy of the Graflex shutter or something more

> elaborate.
>    If its like the Graflex shutter you must remember to put the dark
slide 
> back in the holder or adaptor before winding the shutter or it will
expose 
> the film.
>

It is the same shutter as in the Graflex.
Just read that I can use Pacemaker Graphic lens boards on the
MicroPress so this it a good thing.

http://www.mppusers.freeuk.com/lensboards.htm

Today I got a used 6x9 Horseman back and I also
purchased a 90/6.8 Angulon which I now need a
lens board for. It is a nice little lens and give a bit
more wideangle on 6x9 than the 135 mm Xenar.
I know much better lenses are out there.....Super
Angulon's etc but the 90/6.8 was cheap and good for starting
up I think. It has a Synchro - Compur - P shutter which go
to 1/500. The Xenar is a Rapid which goes to 1/400 and
has no X/M switch. Do you know which type of flash
the Rapid shutter can synch. with?

The Compur shutter on the 90/6.8 has the usual little
knob which normally is used for the self-timer by pu****ng the
little knob a bit which allows the arm to go a little further.
But on this shutter version it seems to have another purpose?
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-01 23:49:07 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-11-01 19:14:08 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-02 07:29:42 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-11-02 06:38:39 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-02 17:25:27 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-11-02 16:55:30 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-02 20:20:16 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-11-02 16:14:08 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-02 21:46:09 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-02 20:40:18 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-03 09:28:46 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-03 14:59:49 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-03 23:40:40 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-03 20:57:08 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-04 10:08:42 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
Peter <p2macgahan@[EMA  2007-11-02 00:55:16 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-02 17:15:51 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-02 13:02:31 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-02 13:14:28 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Max Perl" <  2007-11-02 22:21:34 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
murrayatuptowngallery <  2007-11-07 23:01:08 
Re: MicroPress 4x5 question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-08 03:12:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 21:45:45 CDT 2008.