Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Large Format Photo Equipment > Notes on an ant...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 5 Topic 2265 of 2307
Post > Topic >>

Notes on an antique shutter

by David Nebenzahl <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 7, 2008 at 12:45 AM

Just got finished rebuilding my old Rochester Optical shutter; seems to 
be working about as well as it was when new. But I have a few questions 
about it, directed to those who know a lot more about these old units 
than I.

First of all, let me ID the shutter: it's a pneumatic shutter that says 
"R. O. & C. Co/Rochester, N.Y." on the top. On the bottom, on the 
aperture scale is "VICTOR". Speeds are 1-2-5-25-100 plus T & B. The lens 
says "SYMMETRICAL 5x7" on the side of the front element. Marked 
apertures are 8-16-32-64-256 (!!).

My questions:

1. As I said, I think I got this working about as well as it ever did. 
The "slow" speeds (those below 1/25) seem extremely dependant on the 
condition of the (right-hand) pneumatic cylinder. With the cylinder (& 
piston) clean and dry, the speeds are noticeably much too fast. When I 
applied a little bit of oil, they slowed down appreciably. Seems as this 
is simply a fact of life for these types of shutters; sticky oil, dirt, 
or cold weather is likely to have major effects on shutter speeds. Was 
the photographer expected to keep his or her shutter "in tune"?

2. Speaking of pneumatic cylinders, the shutter has two, one on each 
side. But the one on the left does absolutely nothing! There's even a 
hole at the bottom of the cylinder. Were there other models that 
actually used both cylinders? If so, perhaps they wanted to keep the 
appearance the same, so they kept the left cylinder even though it is 
non-functional. Can't think of any other reason to have it there.

3. The operation of the shutter--that is, how the operator uses 
it--leaves much to be desired. There's no provision for a cable release. 
The same lever is used for cocking (push up) and shutter releasing (push 
down). So the only way one would get good results with long exposures 
would be if one had a very steady hand (or a massive tripod, or both).

The thing that doesn't seem right is that the shutter doesn't work 
correctly unless one keeps the lever held down until the shutter closes. 
If you release the shutter but then let go of the lever before the 
exposure ends, the shutter will stay open until you press the lever 
again. Is this the way these were supposed to work? (I guess I've been 
spoiled by modern shutters.)




 5 Posts in Topic:
Notes on an antique shutter
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2008-01-07 00:45:45 
Re: Notes on an antique shutter
____ <internetphobic@[  2008-01-07 18:23:51 
Re: Notes on an antique shutter
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2008-01-07 20:05:31 
Re: Notes on an antique shutter
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2008-01-07 17:58:57 
Re: Notes on an antique shutter
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2008-01-07 20:03:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat May 17 0:35:52 CDT 2008.