In article <GtmdnchYWrutry_anZ2dnUVZ_vDinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Alric
Knebel <alric@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > --- I don't get it. The digital camera now is what Polaroid used to
> > be, only better. Where's the loss?
> >
>
> That's what I was thinking. And these home printing processes are
> getting better all the time. I saw a photo printed the other day, and I
> couldn't tell that it was done at home. And think of the creative
> freedom you have with photoshop, how you can fix the errors.
I agree. What someone has to come up with is a digital camera with a
built in printer, so you can give a physical photo to a third person
instantly...
--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total ****. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
|
