On Mar 2, 10:00=A0am, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote:
> In article
<internetphobic-CCE0CD.21225301032...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> ____ =A0<internetpho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >In article <fqcr34$1c...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote:
>
> >> Time to plug in the densitometer again and hope it's still working, I
> >> suppose. =A0I wonder what exactly Kodak is up to: did they revert
produ=
ction
> >> to how (and where?) it used to be before the first set of changes?
>
> >They probably didn't bother to rewrite the data sheet,...just rename
it.
>
> No -- they made a dramatic change in their development recommendation
for
> the second version of the film, but now seem to have changed it back.
>
> The densitometer seems to work, so we'll see...
>
> --
> =A0 Thor Lancelot Simon =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0
=
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> =A0 "The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency
is =
to
> =A0 =A0be abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." =A0 =A0 =A0
=A0 =
=A0 =A0- Noam Chomsky
Very interested in what you learn; please let us know.
|
