Amazing!
Having re-read this post in day time, I now see the question. Bum, My
continual problem with late night web gazing:(
Can I take back my inappropriate response. (blush,blush)
"MangroveRoot" <zcukpkn02@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:C323k.1208$Mu.42@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Howard Lester wrote:
>> "MangroveRoot" wrote
>>
>>> Would I be right in the belief that this question, and the solutions
to
>>> it,
>>> would be applicable to formats other than "large",
>>> should one care to do such a thing?
>>
>> If the lenses you use for your 645 are attached directly to the body,
and
>> especially if your 645 has a built in TTL meter, the answer is "no." If
>> your lens attaches via a bellows, and your 645 doesn't have TTL, then
the
>> answer is "yes." The greater the extension of the lens from the body,
the
>> greater the required exposure.
>
> That would be a "no" on both counts.
> I *do* have a set of metal extension tubes, but that's not the same
thing.
> I was just curious. Sometimes it's nice to know more than I think I'll
> need.
>
> Thank you Howard and otzi; your answers were ... illuminating!
|
