Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Medium Format Photo Equipment > Medium format v...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 216 Topic 3393 of 3585
Post > Topic >>

Medium format versus digital sharpness

by Robert Montgomery <info-block@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 5, 2007 at 02:05 AM

How many megapixels would a digital camera image file need to equal the 
sharpness of a six-by-seven centimeter or a four-by-five-inch
transparency?

Robert
 




 216 Posts in Topic:
Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-05 02:05:33 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-05 12:29:20 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Einst Stein <einst_ste  2007-11-18 17:59:48 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-19 05:32:30 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-05 15:59:17 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Dana Myers <dana.myers  2007-10-05 08:01:03 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-05 16:24:47 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-05 19:46:02 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-06 11:43:04 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"ftran999" <  2007-10-06 20:57:21 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
sivananda <maha.mrtyun  2007-10-07 23:11:56 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-07 03:48:12 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-07 11:26:06 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-07 05:09:42 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-07 02:27:58 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-07 14:58:21 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Dana Myers <dana.myers  2007-10-08 14:15:18 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-06 17:41:27 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-07 13:04:52 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-07 15:05:50 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-07 22:42:50 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-10-14 00:37:58 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-07 15:02:07 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Ken Hart" <  2007-10-05 13:21:14 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-05 21:30:37 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Matthew Winn <*@[EMAIL  2007-10-07 10:41:20 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-07 20:49:32 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Michael Benveniste <mh  2007-10-07 21:25:14 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-08 16:32:36 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Michael Benveniste&  2007-10-08 11:49:16 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-08 18:15:39 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Michael Benveniste&  2007-10-08 14:06:39 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-08 20:28:39 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Michael Benveniste <mh  2007-10-08 21:34:11 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-09 11:53:40 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Michael Benveniste&  2007-10-09 09:14:18 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-09 07:35:35 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-09 07:22:08 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Michael Benveniste&  2007-10-10 11:07:23 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-08 12:19:54 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Michael Benveniste&  2007-10-09 09:30:27 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-09 14:16:25 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-09 08:35:31 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-09 19:13:28 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-09 09:33:42 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-09 21:09:34 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-09 12:06:47 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-10 10:49:54 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-10 20:17:48 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-10 13:07:00 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-10 06:11:18 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-13 19:19:44 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-13 19:24:13 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-13 20:05:32 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-14 18:10:31 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-14 18:48:32 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-14 20:26:36 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-15 00:43:46 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-15 10:04:13 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-15 07:58:56 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-15 23:11:25 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-15 15:18:44 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-15 21:37:12 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-15 18:09:18 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-16 17:48:57 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
wsb <wsb@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-10-16 14:45:33 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
sivananda <maha.mrtyun  2007-10-17 01:51:37 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-17 14:03:24 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-17 14:39:27 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-17 11:18:12 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-18 15:55:50 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-18 16:54:20 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-19 17:51:53 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-19 20:32:18 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-20 15:08:31 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-20 19:45:34 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-20 10:05:36 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Lobby Dosser <lobby.do  2007-10-20 23:26:44 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
sivananda <maha.mrtyun  2007-10-17 16:56:46 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-18 15:15:45 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-18 15:33:03 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-18 07:52:09 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-19 18:12:34 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-19 08:33:55 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Rebecca Ore <macogoens  2007-10-18 21:44:51 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-16 23:13:38 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-17 09:58:57 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-17 13:21:57 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
sivananda <maha.mrtyun  2007-10-18 18:03:48 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-19 18:04:55 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Michael Benveniste <mh  2007-10-19 23:27:00 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-20 12:43:03 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-20 14:49:20 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
sivananda <maha.mrtyun  2007-10-21 03:56:11 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Rebecca Ore <macogoens  2007-10-21 11:52:44 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
sivananda <maha.mrtyun  2007-10-21 22:26:41 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-22 19:55:50 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Rebecca Ore <macogoens  2007-10-22 23:07:02 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Andrew Price <ajprice@  2007-10-17 19:57:05 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-14 20:41:07 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-15 00:38:58 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Dave <dsphotog2@[EMAIL  2007-10-15 17:22:36 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-15 21:32:22 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Dave <dsphotog2@[EMAIL  2007-10-16 16:10:55 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-16 23:56:08 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-17 00:12:40 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-14 18:52:23 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-17 00:08:19 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-16 15:31:38 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Robert Montgomery <inf  2007-10-15 21:43:08 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Rebecca Ore <macogoens  2007-10-13 20:12:31 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-10 02:26:21 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-10 13:14:24 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-10 23:49:54 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-10 16:12:59 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-10 08:08:24 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-10-10 18:40:41 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-10 09:08:42 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-09 21:17:34 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-09 10:48:44 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Matthew Winn <*@[EMAIL  2007-10-08 10:20:27 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-08 18:59:39 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-08 16:45:01 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Q.G. de Bakker"  2007-10-08 16:41:16 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Matthew Winn <*@[EMAIL  2007-10-09 07:54:31 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
chasfs <chasfs@[EMAIL   2007-10-05 11:58:08 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
-= H.=- <fakeaddress-d  2007-10-07 12:26:56 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-07 03:17:10 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
-= H.=- <fakeaddress-d  2007-10-07 13:46:57 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-16 16:57:50 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-17 10:01:28 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-17 06:32:36 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-17 23:50:55 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-17 07:30:11 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Summer Wind" &  2007-10-19 21:54:31 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-19 12:59:37 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Summer Wind" &  2007-10-20 11:12:17 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-10-21 21:47:22 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-17 09:11:56 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-17 06:35:52 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Max Perl" <  2007-10-18 00:44:27 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-18 10:18:50 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Max Perl" <  2007-10-18 08:13:24 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-18 08:19:50 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-17 19:17:26 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Max Perl" <  2007-10-18 08:22:14 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-17 19:19:54 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-17 16:53:26 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Paul Friday <Devce@[EM  2007-10-18 19:28:59 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-22 06:24:13 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-23 04:17:24 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-23 23:56:40 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-23 11:52:16 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-11-07 04:26:05 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-07 08:58:56 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-11-07 23:01:09 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-07 13:43:03 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-07 08:28:38 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-07 18:49:49 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-11-08 08:33:52 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Ken Hart" <  2007-11-08 00:09:09 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-11-08 05:46:13 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-11-08 15:04:50 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-07 20:59:59 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Ken Hart" <  2007-11-08 09:28:06 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-11-09 00:01:15 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Ken Hart" <  2007-11-08 13:03:14 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-08 19:17:30 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-11-09 04:20:20 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-08 16:39:37 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Ken Hart" <  2007-11-08 19:59:30 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-11-09 10:22:20 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Ken Hart" <  2007-11-08 23:14:01 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-08 18:40:07 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-09 12:13:43 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-08 17:13:24 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-11-09 13:53:08 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-08 10:22:39 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-07 20:51:23 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-08 08:22:44 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-11-08 23:43:10 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-08 12:27:24 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-11-07 20:57:22 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-08 08:29:56 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-11-08 08:53:38 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-08 14:51:15 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-11-09 00:16:47 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-09 11:45:06 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-11-09 09:36:56 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-09 16:04:43 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-11-09 12:56:48 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-09 08:30:48 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-09 20:11:11 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-11-09 17:14:54 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-10 09:01:03 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-10 03:37:59 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Neil Gould" &l  2007-11-10 15:32:36 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-11-10 11:03:05 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-11-10 09:03:16 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-23 18:15:18 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-23 16:07:10 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-23 19:27:22 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-23 17:16:39 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-10-23 23:58:43 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"Max Perl" <  2007-10-25 00:04:37 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-23 23:54:44 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-24 16:41:37 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-24 04:49:43 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-24 22:29:04 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-10-24 04:55:40 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Dana Myers <dana.myers  2007-10-24 09:05:29 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-24 04:53:19 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Noons <wizofoz2k@[EMAI  2007-10-29 03:18:07 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Raphael Bustin <rafeb@  2007-10-29 20:38:03 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
"David J. Littleboy&  2007-10-30 10:23:08 
Re: Medium format versus digital sharpness
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-11-01 15:51:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 2:37:26 CST 2008.