I agree that there is about a 3:1 differential in real world
usability.
So you might need 30 megapixels to gets results similar to 6x7.
That said, we should keep in mind that the DSLRs do in camera
processing - sharpening, white balance adjustment, etc.
Scanning film gives us the op****tunity to do the same types of
correction. Most of the scanned film images on the web are
"raw", but I'm including post processing in the 3:1 figure above.
If you really need 110 MP, you can always stitch together 3 or 4
6x7 images.
On Oct 10, 10:49 am, "David J. Littleboy" <davi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> The best scans (of films that people actually use) I've ever seen are
very
> soft compared to the images the 5D coughs up every frame, frame after
frame
> after frame. (It looks to me that one MP of a 5D image has about as much
> photographically significant subject detail in it as 3MP of the best
scans.)
|
