Recently, Invid Fan <invid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> posted:
> In article <GtmdnchYWrutry_anZ2dnUVZ_vDinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Alric
> Knebel <alric@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> WQ wrote:
>>
>>> --- I don't get it. The digital camera now is what Polaroid used to
>>> be, only better. Where's the loss?
>>>
>>
>> That's what I was thinking. And these home printing processes are
>> getting better all the time. I saw a photo printed the other day,
>> and I couldn't tell that it was done at home. And think of the
>> creative freedom you have with photoshop, how you can fix the errors.
>
> I agree. What someone has to come up with is a digital camera with a
> built in printer, so you can give a physical photo to a third person
> instantly...
>
Hmmm... that sounds a lot like... a Polaroid!
Neil
|
