Re: Built-in flash in P&S digital and DSLR cameras

"franklin-d-worth" <fdworth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:o0qjj35lovft9c926fm7s1pbicpppdtjep@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:46:10 +0100, "Bill Again" <sd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>Frankly it reduces to one thing. Show me a professional photographer
that 
>>is
>>using a point and shoot.
>>
>>That's all.
>
>
> http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6468-7844
>
>
> There you go. I guess you'll have to switch now since you say it reduces

> to just
> this one thing. Just show you one pro that uses a P&S camera.
>
> That's just one. I'm another. So are many others.
>
> How sad that you set your equipment criteria by what others are using.

Only if they are using it because it is better suited for the job.


>Can't you
> think for yourself? Do you only take photos of subjects that others have

> already
> photographed too? If nobody else has photographed that subject in the
same 
> way
> then it must not be worth photographing according to the way you choose 
> things.
> If I did that I'd find another career.

 So where did I say these things? You are making this up as you go along, 
right?.


> One person on dpreview who regularly provides work for house & home and
> architectural photojournalism magazines regularly slips in photos from
his 
> P&S
> cameras. The publishers and editors never notice any difference in his 
> work. He
> doesn't want them to know that he's using his P&S cameras for most of
his
> photography due to the stigma that people like you have attached to
them. 
> Then
> he wouldn't be a "professional" photographer, right?

Like me? Wow. You mean that I am not alone in these views? You astound me.


> Just because they don't say they use them for their professional work 
> doesn't
> mean that they don't use them for that.

And this shows exactly what?

That's all.

Bill