Re: Built-in flash in P&S digital and DSLR cameras

"franklin-d-worth" <fdworth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:gngkj3hr7hor3k003m4rob3llu932gea2h@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:13:40 +0000, Chris Savage
> <spam.goes.here@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On 2007-11-13, Bill Again <sd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> You remind me with that comment of an article I read recently by Jane
>>> Bown,
>>> [...]
>>>
>>><quote>
>>> I'm not very particular about equipment: I use Olympus OM1s and have
>>> about a
>>> dozen, all purchased second-hand more than 40 years ago, and while I
>>> have
>>> [...]
>>><unquote>
>>>
>>
>>How reliable a source can we consider this to be? She was buying a
>>camera, second-hand, more than five years before anyone outside Olympus
>>ever
>>saw one.
>>
>>Whatever. I don't understand the 'available light' dogma. I'm with
Eugene
>>Smith on the matter.
>
>
> Just as reliable as all the other propagandistic "advice" that dSLR
> advocates
> hand out. I was waiting to see if anyone would notice the blatant error
of
> their
> "proof". :-) Couch-potato photographers always slip up in their facts
when
> all
> they have for reference in life is what they read online, in lieu of any
> real-life experience with anything related to the topic.
>

You are an ignorant and unmannered person. Blatant error of "their proof".
What arrogant nonsense. The quote was not proof of anything, it was a
quote
from an article by Jane Bown. This photographer is now 82 years old and
far
from being a "couch potato photographer" she has photographed more
personalities than you could shake a stick at. She doesn't need to prove
anything, certainly not to idiots like you.

That's all.



<snipped the rest of the junk>