Ron Hunter wrote:
> timeOday wrote:
>> Trev wrote:
>>> aniramca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>> I do not own both cameras. However, looking through lots of samples
>>>> available in the web, I seems to notice that photos (mostly the ones
>>>> that I observed were ****traits) taken using Canon high end DSLR (1D,
>>>> 1Ds,5D,10D, etc.) appear to have light or bland colors. In contrast,
>>>> Nikon high end DSLR (D1, D2, D3, D200, D300, etc) appears to produce
>>>> brighter, contrasting and rich colors. Both, however, have extremely
>>>> sharp images. Is this general observation correct, or does it just
>>>> depend on the photographer, the lens, lighting and the colors on the
>>>> subject?
>>>> Thanks for comments
>>> May be more to do with Compression for the net
>>>
>>
>> Why would compression artifacts affect one brand more than the other?
>
> Because different brands of cameras use different logic for the
> compression, and apply different parameters to the compression process.
He said "compression for the net" which to me does not imply on-camera
processing. Images above even 1 megapixel are quite rare on the 'net.
|
