timeOday wrote:
> Ron Hunter wrote:
>> timeOday wrote:
>>> Trev wrote:
>>>> aniramca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>> I do not own both cameras. However, looking through lots of
>>>>> samples available in the web, I seems to notice that photos
>>>>> (mostly the ones that I observed were ****traits) taken using
>>>>> Canon high end DSLR (1D, 1Ds,5D,10D, etc.) appear to have light
>>>>> or bland colors. In contrast, Nikon high end DSLR (D1, D2, D3,
>>>>> D200, D300, etc) appears to produce brighter, contrasting and
>>>>> rich colors. Both, however, have extremely sharp images. Is this
>>>>> general observation correct, or does it just depend on the
>>>>> photographer, the lens, lighting and the colors on the subject?
>>>>> Thanks for comments
>>>> May be more to do with Compression for the net
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why would compression artifacts affect one brand more than the
>>> other?
>>
>> Because different brands of cameras use different logic for the
>> compression, and apply different parameters to the compression
>> process.
>
> He said "compression for the net" which to me does not imply on-camera
> processing. Images above even 1 megapixel are quite rare on the
> 'net.
Yep What I was trying to say is Un less you can inspect the originals
There
is no way of telling the fault Banding being more a problem of low Pixel
count. IE the colours or lightness not spread evenly over the range.
--
Trev
You can always tell a York****re man,
But you can't tell him much.
|
