Re: really no purpose anymore for traditional films (negative or diapositve) (by 2006) ?

In article <Qv28h.2615$oP6.1634@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
babelfish <babelfish2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Not at all. How hard the lasers are driven depends on the Dmax aims that
we 
>establish for our paper calibration. Darker exposures are the result of 
>running more power through the lasers resulting in more heat and shorter 
>life. 

Can you tell us what the Dmax is that you deliver and the Dmax of what
typical low cost RA-4 printing gives?

One thing I find annoying is the lack details companies provide on their
web-site (at least where I live). If you are lucky, you can find their
prices there. Even details like optimal output resolution are almost
never there.


-- 
That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it
could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done
by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make.
	-- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency