Re: really no purpose anymore for traditional films (negative or diapositve) (by 2006) ?

In article <x_C8h.2752$w37.693@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
babelfish <babelfish2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>I'm going to write up a web 
>page with the description and more charts for anyone who's interested. 
>Unfortunately, the number of people who care about such things and are 
>willing to pay for it are a quickly vani****ng breed. My more realistic 
>choices are to reduce our standards and prices to what everyone else does
or 
>else close the lab. Not good choices. After thirty years of striving for 
>excellence I've arrived at the point where sadly, there's no market for
it. 

The advantage of digital printing is that you can order prints from any
lab
as long as ****pping shots remain reasonable.

The problem I have is that other than word of mouth, there is no way to
find a good lab, because they can't bothered to tell you what they do.


-- 
That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it
could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done
by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make.
	-- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency