Re: really no purpose anymore for traditional films (negative or diapositve) (by 2006) ?

In article <w7Rah.7340$Kw2.4199@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, jeremy <jeremy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>Kodak already does this with their Gold 200 
>negative film.  "Made in China for Eastman Kodak" is discreetly printed
on 
>the box.  Other than that, one would never know the difference.

The thing is, I don't want to buy Gold 200. That seems to be the
difference with Fuji. Fuji seems to making film for people who want to
continue to use film. Kodak's attitude is more that there are some people
who have not yet converted to digital; so let's speed up that process.


-- 
That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it
could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done
by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make.
	-- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency