In article <144c0ci23077oasjspesfubus2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
philip@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Philip Homburg) wrote:
> In article <qwWah.13008$9e.12377@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> babelfish <babelfish2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >There's no way to tell if an image has been manipulated if it's done
well
> >any more. Just because it's on film mean's nothing because we've been
> >putting high resolution digital files back onto sheet film for decades.
Then
> >there's the fact that all film becomes a digital file before it's
printed
> >anyway. If he really felt that way, he should go back to making
separation
> >negatives and printing plates optically rather than scans.
>
> For fine grained film, dye cloud sizes can be in the order of
micrometers.
> Are you saying that you are printing to film at 25000 ppi?
>
> If not, there is a good chance that the difference will be visible
> under a microscope.
I've yet to see film output that visually did not look fuzzy compared to
an original- although the last time I had access to seeing it on a
regular basis was 5 years.
--
"As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely,
the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great
and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire
at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
- H. L. Mencken, in the Baltimore Sun, July 26, 1920.
Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.
www.gregblankphoto.com
|
