Re: Wedding photography

"Caesar" <caesar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:MPG.2101707c9ff982e498968b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <1184221850.826596@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> krash@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>> I get my prints for .19 cents each at Wal-Mart, londondrugs,
superstores
>> etc..... you are getting ripped off... kk
>> (I am in Canada)
>
> Hi,
>
> As the old saying is- you get what you pay for.
>
> 1. Our lab looks at every photo and adjusts it to the best they can.
> Try this in your Wal-Mart.
> 2. Chemicals are regularily changed to ensure highest possible outcome.
>
> Cheers
>

Anyone considering buying 2 cameras and their lenses to become a aWedding 
photographer should totally disregard the cost of prints and get them made

at a Professional lab.

There is no place for Walmart prints in a wedding album. All prints are
not 
equal. The life of a 19¢ print may be as little as a few years due to 
quality cutting measures used to get the cost down.

A Pro I work for costs his 10 x 15 cm (4x6) prints at $2 each and I'll bet

good money the albums they go in will look as good as new in 50 years
time.

I see plenty of magenta shifted prints from mini-labs and plenty of older 
wedding photos still with origianl colours.

Of course if you intend to be a moonlighter, what does quality matter if
the 
customer can't find you when they learn you ripped them off?

JA 



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com