Re: 160S/160C vs 160NC/160VC

<mark.thomas.7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Somebody..???

I've shot both, but I've never done a head-to-head
comparison and likely never will.  With the lighting and
labs I use I _think_ I slightly prefer the Fuji.  Both
have excellent grain structure, but the prints from the
Kodak film have a fraction more blue than I'd like.

Since my last decent sized portraiture project, one of
my local labs has switched from analog to digital
enlargements.  The next time I use them for 160S, I'll
add in a 160NC shot and take another look.

My home scanner is an older CanoScan FS4000US, so I what
I see off of the scanner doesn't do either film justice.

-- 
Michael Benveniste -- mhb-offer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 and UCE professionally evaluated for $250.  Use this email
address only to submit mail for evaluation.