Re: 160S/160C vs 160NC/160VC

Bill Tuthill wrote:
> Now that the new Kodak Portra films have been out for a while,
> has anybody seen a trustworthy head-to-head comparison of Fuji's
> Pro 160S vs Portra 160NC and 160C vs 160VC?

I've shot dozens of rolls of 160NC.   It is a fine portrait film and 
scans beautifully.   I've only shot a few rolls of the VC so no comment.
In any case rate/meter at ISO 100.

The Fuji is highly regarded as well by those who use it.  I've got 5 
rolls of Fuji 160S in 120 format in the freezer... need to shoot that 
one of these days.

I don't think you can go wrong with either Kodak or Fuji on these films. 
  Just hope that they're around for a while.

Cheers,
Alan


-- 
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.