Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Film Labs > Re: Wedding pho...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 31 of 32 Topic 1254 of 1284
Post > Topic >>

Re: Wedding photography

by Chris Hills <chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 12, 2007 at 10:54 AM

In message <MPG.20fb46b0e7a3d3a9989682@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
Caesar <caesar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>Hi,
>
>I shot film (35mm) for many years, had my own dark room and stopped 10
>years ago. Now I want to jump back shooting weddings. Since my
>photographer is leaving us and the area, I better do it now myself since
>I have to attend to the weddings anyway.
>
>I still have a Canon 10D which I bought 5 years ago. This is not an
>option and would be only a back-up.
>
>I'm thinking of buying two new Canon EOS 3 film cameras. You might think
>why go "backwards" and not digital.
>Well I thought about it and I believe film is still the better option
>(price, time consumption and quality).

I would say go digital. I have the interesting experience of seeing a 
pro photographer at a formal dinner.  He did the pictures of people 
being presented on arriving.   Just before we went in to dinner he 
discovered a problem with the memory card. He was reviewing things on a 
laptop.

We all had to line up and be presented again on the way into dinner.

My point is that had he had the equally unlikely failure with film he 
would not have known until the following morning when it would have been 
far too late and there would have been no pictures..

As they had a laptop and projector there after dinner  we could see (and 
order) our prints. Also it prompted some people to have additional 
pictures taken with friends.

As was pointed out by the poster with the slide show: With digital you 
can show/check  the photos (and get some orders)  as soon as they are 
taken. This gives you the op****tunity to rectify any problems.

It is amazing what can happen outside your control at these events.

As for quality.... a 10/12Mp Canon or Nikon et-al digital back will give 
the required quality. You may be able to tell the difference if you blow 
the image up to 6foot square but I about any of the quests would even if 
you point it out to them.

You could buy a film and a digital back, use both and I bet that after a 
couple of months the film back won't come out of it's box.
-- 
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
      www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
 




 32 Posts in Topic:
Wedding photography
Caesar <caesar@[EMAIL   2007-07-08 19:09:12 
Re: Wedding photography
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-07-08 14:15:39 
Re: Wedding photography
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2007-07-09 15:33:18 
Re: Wedding photography
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-07-09 16:01:16 
Re: Wedding photography / Did you know...
"© James Roney"  2007-07-16 17:38:29 
Re: Wedding photography / Did you know...
Scott W <biphoto@[EMAI  2007-07-16 08:22:59 
Re: Wedding photography / Did you know...
"© James Roney"  2007-07-16 22:13:02 
Re: Wedding photography / Did you know...
"© James Roney"  2007-07-16 22:27:17 
Re: Wedding photography
"the_niner_nation&qu  2007-07-08 23:44:39 
Re: Wedding photography
"William Graham"  2007-07-11 15:53:58 
Re: Wedding photography
Caesar <caesar@[EMAIL   2007-07-12 09:59:17 
Re: Wedding photography
"www.kevinkienlein.c  2007-07-11 23:28:57 
Re: Wedding photography
Richard Polhill <richa  2007-07-12 07:40:49 
Re: Wedding photography
ellis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-07-12 07:43:10 
Re: Wedding photography
"JoeT" <glit  2007-07-12 05:43:28 
Re: Wedding photography
"www.kevinkienlein.c  2007-07-13 03:16:09 
Re: Wedding photography
Caesar <caesar@[EMAIL   2007-07-13 11:21:01 
Re: Wedding photography
"dooey" <doo  2007-07-13 19:28:26 
Re: Wedding photography
"Dave J" <da  2007-07-27 09:55:01 
Re: Wedding photography
"Julian." <c  2007-07-14 08:19:59 
Re: Wedding photography
Pudentame <no.one@[EMA  2007-07-13 17:45:37 
Re: Wedding photography
"Matt Clara" &l  2007-07-19 00:16:18 
Re: Wedding photography
Unspam <unspam@[EMAIL   2007-07-20 09:07:10 
Re: Wedding photography
Jim   2007-07-11 22:01:42 
Re: Wedding photography
Caesar <caesar@[EMAIL   2007-07-13 11:28:40 
Re: Wedding photography
Caesar <caesar@[EMAIL   2007-07-13 11:23:54 
Re: Wedding photography
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2007-07-12 07:22:52 
Re: Wedding photography
teflon <teflon@[EMAIL   2007-07-13 13:02:12 
Re: Wedding photography
"Sam I am" <  2007-07-14 18:06:03 
Re: Wedding photography
HDAGHL HMACKENZ <dale.  2007-11-07 11:09:29 
Re: Wedding photography
Chris Hills <chris@[EM  2007-11-12 10:54:54 
Re: Wedding photography
Chris Hills <chris@[EM  2007-11-12 11:46:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Jul 5 23:49:43 CDT 2008.