Re: Wedding photography

In message <kkHTVcD+DDOHFAww@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Chris Hills 
<chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>As for quality.... a 10/12Mp Canon or Nikon et-al digital back will 
>give the required quality. You may be able to tell the difference if 
>you blow the image up to 6foot square but I about any of the quests 
>would even if you point it out to them.

Typos abound...

"But I doubt any of the guests would even if you point it out to them" 
......

Lets face it so many pros (and others) use digital successfully for 
weddings and other major events that the quality issue is a non starter 
for the real world except among the annaly retentive.




-- 
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
      www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/