"Neil Barker" <neil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.225fda68daea7fa989b56@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <Cg_Ij.28625$r76.17822@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> says...
>>
>> "Neil Barker" <neil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.225e0db820680345989b54@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > In article <lIHIj.11872$Q52.9062@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > says...
>> >
>> >> Would I pay for the right photos? Gladly.
>> >
>> > In which case you should have stated as much, as there have been oh
too
>> > many idiots come to newsgroups like this in the past and expect
things
>> > doing for them for free. You get some people who think that because
>> > digital photography largely removes the material/processing element,
>> > that photos should therefore be cheaper. That isn't the case.
>>
>> I NEVER asked for a single thing for free.
>
> And you never offered to pay, either.
PAY FOR WHAT!? YOU STILL HAVEN'T PRODUCED A DAMNED THING!
How much do I bid for your nothing? Twice that!
jim
|
