by "jim" <jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 7, 2008 at 06:18 AM
"Neil Barker" <neil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.22632a1b22b30553989b5b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <T0ZJj.28118$dT.12586@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> says...
>>
>> "Neil Barker" <neil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.225fda68daea7fa989b56@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> > And you never offered to pay, either.
>>
>> PAY FOR WHAT!? YOU STILL HAVEN'T PRODUCED A DAMNED THING!
>
> You have a bad attitude problem Jim, you really do.
>
> You didn't explain yourself at all well in your initial post and
> everyone here took it as meaning you were expecting them free. Perhaps
> that should tell you something.
Actually it does. it tells me that that is the behavior that you have
come
to expect from people - even when that is not what is said.
That tells me that most people that have sought photos through you in the
past were looking for free photos.
That tells me that people (in general) do not value good photography.
What it does not tell me is why I was lumped in with those assholes base
purely on assumptions by posters in these ngs.
jim
