David Ruether wrote:
> The cheap LCDs may produce "pretty pictures", but the problems
> come when you are trying to decide if that green in the sky is real or
> not, or why most of the colors look right, but the water looks
> suspiciously bright green (these are problems I've had with LCDs).
Because the 22" widescreen Samsung monitor produced such clean looking
images in the shop I bought one, ony to find out that it could not
produce a decent grey scale. A problem with these particular monitors is
that the panels themselves come from different factories, so quality is
likely to vary a lot. Traded it in for a widescreen Philips, better but
still far from perfect.
Another matter is whether widescreen is a good idea for non-landscape
photos.
> As with anything, you can work with less than perfection in your
> tools, but it is easier not to need to - but money counts, also. So far,
> using the combination of an adequate PVA Acer 24" + a CRT for
> checking for weird color errors has worked, and my 24" cost "only"
> $280...
-- Hans


|