Matt Ion wrote:
> John Navas wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:26:18 -0800, Matt Ion <soundy106@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote
>> in <fpb4u1$1cg$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>
>>> l v wrote:
>>>> Lars-Erik Østerud wrote:
>>>>> I have a huge amount JPG photos WITHOUT EXIF date indo.
>>>>> But it seens like the PS3 only uses EXIF date for sorting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Så all images without EXIF date ends up in the current
>>>>> year and month (like "FEB 2008" or "2008") when sorting.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have the original date in the files "date modified",
>>>>> but need a program then can create the EXIF date info
>>>>> from the file-date. But I can only find the opposite :-(
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know how to copy the file-date to the EXIF date
>>>>> for several >1000 JPG files in an easy way? Please?
>>>> What operating system?
>>> I find that almost universally, it's the non-Windows users who are
>>> intelligent enough to provide OS information. Your typical Windows
>>> (l)user doesn't understand that not all computers run on Windows.
>>> Thus it's safe to assume that we're dealing with some version of
>>> Windows here.
>>
>> It's a matter of market share, not intelligence.
>
> Why can't it be both?
>
> I'll say it again: Your typical Windows (l)user doesn't understand that
> not all computers run on Windows.
>
>> Insulting Windows users does you no credit.
>
> Good thing I'm not looking for credit.
>
Typically, Windows users assume that everyone IS using Windows, probably
because 95% of computer users ARE using Windows. It is a reasonable, if
not always correct, assumption, if the OS in use is not stated.
Hardly an insult, in any case.
|
