Re: Interview with Henry Wilhelm on print permanence

"=(8)" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:463b66c0$0$14074$742ec2ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Does your "interview" cover why in their testing they don't test with
real 
> world conditions, like varying humidity, heat and cold fluxuations, 
> airborne polutants, dirt and other airborne substances? All of why by
the 
> way plays an im****tant part in the life of anything you place on your 
> walls?
>
> This is why there testings is worth dog poo. Until they add in 
> invironmental factors like those found in average peoples homes their 
> tests will alway be a joke. They also need to spend less time trying to 
> duplicate museum like environments and more in duplicating the
evironments 
> of the people that will be buying most of these printers, papers and
inks 
> and that is the average consumer.
>
> =(8)

Well that's pretty negative. As it happens I disagree with most of what
you 
say. Although these"tests" are not real world stuff they are nevertheless
an 
indication of how the ink/paper will, or might, react overtime. This is 
better than no idea at all.

So thanks Wayne.

Robert R.