Re: Interview with Henry Wilhelm on print permanence

Mr.T wrote:

> "frederick" <lost@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1178322277.137906@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>Sure - I agree that because an ink/paper combination gets a 200 year DPR
>>from Wilhelm doesn't mean it will last 200 years on my dining room wall.
>>  But you can be highly confident that it will last much longer than an
>>ink/paper combination rated at 10 years.
> 
> 
> And that is where you may be mistaken. As others have pointed out
already,
> that would ONLY be the case IF the dominant mode of failure was under
test,
> or at least common to both cases. This CANNOT be assumed to always be
so. In
> fact the Epson case makes that quite obvious.
> 
> MrT.
> 
> 

I also think Epson do sponsor the Wilhelm tests.

rm