

|
 |
| << Topic |
< Post |
Post 14 of 18 Topic 1371 of 1528
|
Post > |
Topic >> |
Re: Circular Polarizers, A Filter You Need
by "Wayne J. Cosshall" <wayne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Aug 9, 2007 at 06:46 AM
| Actually I should add that the camera manual will often specify whether
a circ. pol. is needed with a particular model. If not, tech sup****t or
the sup****t pages on their web site should be able to tell you.
Cheers,
Wayne
Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/
Wayne J. Cosshall wrote:
> Both polarizers work the same way, just the circular has a second layer
> to depolarize the resulting light. The polarizing part does the same
> thing, so there should be no difference, all other things being equal.
> However there are different materials used and so they can vary
> significantly between brands and even within brands if the manufacturer
> has changed process.
>
> Some cameras will be more sensitive to linear polarization than others,
> but if you were buying now it is probably not worth the risk and just
> get a circular one.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> Wayne J. Cosshall
> Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
> Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
> Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
> http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
> Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/
>
>
>
> Fat Sam wrote:
>> Wayne J. Cosshall wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've written the first of a series of articles on the use of real
>>> camera filters with digital photography. The first is on the circular
>>> polarizer filter:
>>> http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1063
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>
>> I have a circular and a linear polariser. I was told that I would be
>> better to use the circular polariser on my digital camera, as it would
>> give better results.
>> But I've used both the linear and the circular polarisers on my
>> digital and I honestly can't see any difference in the results when I
>> compare the two.
>>


|
18 Posts in Topic:
|
"Wayne J. Cosshall&q |
2007-08-08 19:33:26 |
|
"Steven Campbell&quo |
2007-08-08 11:22:48 |
|
"Fat Sam" <s |
2007-08-08 16:08:16 |
|
"Matt Clara" &l |
2007-08-08 11:17:00 |
|
Bob Salomon <bob_salom |
2007-08-08 11:32:46 |
|
"Matt Clara" &l |
2007-08-08 12:05:10 |
|
Bob Salomon <bob_salom |
2007-08-08 12:37:30 |
|
Tony Polson <tp@[EMAIL |
2007-08-08 21:06:07 |
|
Joseph Miller <miller@ |
2007-08-08 13:17:04 |
|
Bob Salomon <bob_salom |
2007-08-08 11:24:50 |
|
"Fat Sam" <s |
2007-08-08 19:05:51 |
|
Bob Salomon <bob_salom |
2007-08-08 14:31:48 |
|
"Wayne J. Cosshall&q |
2007-08-09 06:29:05 |
|
"Wayne J. Cosshall&q |
2007-08-09 06:46:39 |
|
Ray Paseur <Ray.Paseur |
2007-08-08 15:54:37 |
|
"Wayne J. Cosshall&q |
2007-08-09 06:42:08 |
|
acl <achilleaslazaride |
2007-08-08 14:02:55 |
|
Joe Miller <jmiller@[E |
2007-08-09 14:41:02 |
|
Post A Reply:

|
|
|
|