In article <1186606975.869385.189210@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
acl <achilleaslazarides@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 12:17 am, Joseph Miller <mil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > After exiting the filter,
> > circularly polarized light will pass though a camera just the same as
> > unpolarized light, in other words, just fine. The critical thing is
that
> > it won't make any difference at what angle you set that first linear
> > polaroid.
>
> Just to clarify this a bit, the angle of the polaroid filter makes no
> difference as far as the passage through the camera is concerned (ie
> it is not the case that, when it is set to some orientation, the AF
> system, say, will fail). It does make a difference to the
> transmittance, ie it does change the way the scene looks. I imagine
> that this is what you meant, but what you wrote is a bit ambiguous.
Yes, you put it more clearly. I meant as far as light going through the
camera itself is concerned, it makes no difference at which angle the
leading polaroid is set.
Joe


|
18 Posts in Topic:
|
"Wayne J. Cosshall&q |
2007-08-08 19:33:26 |
|
"Steven Campbell&quo |
2007-08-08 11:22:48 |
|
"Fat Sam" <s |
2007-08-08 16:08:16 |
|
"Matt Clara" &l |
2007-08-08 11:17:00 |
|
Bob Salomon <bob_salom |
2007-08-08 11:32:46 |
|
"Matt Clara" &l |
2007-08-08 12:05:10 |
|
Bob Salomon <bob_salom |
2007-08-08 12:37:30 |
|
Tony Polson <tp@[EMAIL |
2007-08-08 21:06:07 |
|
Joseph Miller <miller@ |
2007-08-08 13:17:04 |
|
Bob Salomon <bob_salom |
2007-08-08 11:24:50 |
|
"Fat Sam" <s |
2007-08-08 19:05:51 |
|
Bob Salomon <bob_salom |
2007-08-08 14:31:48 |
|
"Wayne J. Cosshall&q |
2007-08-09 06:29:05 |
|
"Wayne J. Cosshall&q |
2007-08-09 06:46:39 |
|
Ray Paseur <Ray.Paseur |
2007-08-08 15:54:37 |
|
"Wayne J. Cosshall&q |
2007-08-09 06:42:08 |
|
acl <achilleaslazaride |
2007-08-08 14:02:55 |
|
Joe Miller <jmiller@[E |
2007-08-09 14:41:02 |
|