David Kilpatrick <iconmags3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Trev wrote:
>
>>
>> Not bad A max Of £250 for the use of your photo in any way they think
fit.
>>
>>
>> a.. By claiming the prize, the winner authorises the use, without
additional
>> compensation, of his or her name and/or likeness and/or
voice/photograph and
>> city of residence for promotion and/or advertising purposes in any
manner
>> and in any medium (including without limitation, radio broadcasts,
>> newspapers and other publications and in television or film releases,
>> slides, videotape, distribution over the internet and picture date
storage)
>> which the Organisers may deem appropriate.
>> a.. Competitors agree to allow the Organisers the rights for one year
from
>> the closing date of the competition, to use any submitted image for
>> promotional purposes of this competition in any media format and to
alter,
>> crop, montage those images with the consent of the contributor.
>
>Actually, compared with most photo contests this is a very responsible
>couple of clauses - a model release for publicity, plus a one year
>licence to use the image ONLY to promote the contest, and
>modification/montage ONLY with the 'consent of the contributor'.
>
>The TUC is being very correct here, not doing it wrong. What else would
>you expect them to do?
I agree. I was actually going to reply to your message to emphasise
how reasonable the conditions of entry are.
Trev's comments are wide of the mark by a long way.
|
