by "N" <n@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jan 15, 2008 at 07:06 PM
"sonsdad" <sonsdad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:pkrij.7600$g%2.3622@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi
> Without doubt the smaller cards are safer, consider the pain if a 32gb
> card goes down after shooting a wedding
>
It's not the capacity of the card in bytes that matters, it's the number
of
photos on the card. As the photo files get larger the capacity has to
increase. Imagine if we still had 8MB cards?
