Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > British Photography > Re: Best value ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 5 Topic 3721 of 3901
Post > Topic >>

Re: Best value DSLR with one (superzoom) lens

by Paul Giverin <paul@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 26, 2008 at 05:06 PM

In message <jsKdnUrOlNUv2wbanZ2dnUVZ8t6inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, David Kilpatrick 
<iconmags3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>
>Your price might just be possible with the Sony branded version - it's 
>the same lens at heart but the Sony has a faster focusing mechanism. 
>The alternative could be a Pentax K10D (price just dropped because of 
>the K20D arrival) with their similar, slightly wider aperture, 
>18-200mm, or again the Tamron 18-250mm; or the Nikon D40X with the 
>18-200mm VR stabilised Nikon lens (or Sigma alternative).
>
>The only option which doesn't tick the right box is Canon, whose 1.6X 
>sensor factor immediately makes the 18mm end less wide-angle, and which 
>offers no in-body stabilisation,

Why doesn't it tick the right box? The Nikon and Pentax have a 1.5 crop 
factor. The difference between all three cameras at 18mm is not a lot.

>
>Our daughter's Canon kit has a 400D with the kit 18-55mm and an early 
>(secondhand) Canon image stabilised 70-300mm covering the tele end, 
>where the IS stabilisation is extremely beneficial. Now if you can do a 
>search and hunt down such a lens that's a reasonable kit. I do not 
>advice the closest thing Canon has a stabilised superzoom, the full 
>frame 28-135mm IS. It's neither fish nor fowl when used on the smaller 
>digital format, and it's not much better than independent brand optics 
>either.
>
I've got a Canon 28-135mm IS. Its not too bad. I use it as my walk round 
lens although it is quite a heavy lens and you can feel it after its 
been round your neck for an hour or so. Its a little bit soft but 
certainly better than the 18-55mm kit lens. 28mm isn't very wide on a 
1.6 crop (or 1.5 for that matter ;) but it gave me an excuse to get a 
Canon 10-22mm which is wide enough and is admittedly noticeably better 
than my 28-135 in terms of image quality. Of course the 28-135mm is half 
the price of the 10-22mm so you get what you pay for.

I think there are a lot of 28-135's going cheap at the moment because 
its used as the kit lens on some 40D's and new owners are flogging them 
on.

-- 
Paul Giverin

British Jet Engine Website:-    www.britjet.co.uk

My photos:-  www.pbase.com/vendee
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Best value DSLR with one (superzoom) lens
Rick Bowlby <usenet@[E  2008-01-26 14:17:27 
Re: Best value DSLR with one (superzoom) lens
David Kilpatrick <icon  2008-01-26 14:41:54 
Re: Best value DSLR with one (superzoom) lens
Paul Giverin <paul@[EM  2008-01-26 17:06:12 
Re: Best value DSLR with one (superzoom) lens
Rick Bowlby <usenet@[E  2008-01-28 22:13:55 
Re: Best value DSLR with one (superzoom) lens
"chalkstream@[EMAIL   2008-01-30 12:40:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 12:08:06 CDT 2008.