On 2008-02-12 11:33:56 -0500, Ben Micklem <benmicklem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
> in article n813r31a7gbio3oigpfc6orqcml43poq8k@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Polson at
> docnews2011@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 12/2/08 11:40:
>
>> For the same angle of view, and with all other things being equal, you
>> also get more depth of field with a smaller sensor. So your 300D will
>> give greater depth of field than a full-frame Canon EOS 5D or 1Ds.
>
> The OP is using a 300v, a film camera.
>
> To the OP: using a wider lens will make these "all in focus" shots a lot
> easier. With lenses wider than 20mm it will be easy- f/8 should be
enough,
> unless there is something in frame very near the camera. The 300v has a
> depth of field preview button, so you can check in the viewfinder what
will
> be in focus (at really small apertures, it will get pretty dark, so be
> prepared to wait a while for your eyes to adjust).
>
> Ben
Yes, but wider than 20mm on a 35mm camera is very expensive. And I
doubt anyone taking serious wedding pictures would be using a superwide
angle lens on a 35mm SLR.
--
Michael
|
