Re: Interesting article on the amateur photographer hysteria

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:35:34 GMT, Mike_B <usenet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>In message <pan.2008.04.17.17.33.01.35815@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Phil Stovell 
><phil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7351252.stm
>>
>
>I noticed this;
>
>"In May last year, Thames Valley Police overturned a caution issued to 
>photographer Andy Handley of the MK News in Milton Keynes, after he took 
>pictures at the scene of a road accident. "
>
>To have overturned a caution, they must have issued one in the first 
>place and the professional photographer involved must have accepted the 
>caution.

The police will often trick people into accepting a caution because
most people don't realise they are accepting they are admitting to
having committed an offence
>
>One can't help wondering what the caution was, and why it was accepted.

Police trickery. They are institutionally corrupt